Sunday, 1 September 2013


If you found your way here by mistake It’s a quite easy error to make. As I have three domains Under: ‘Spoil Party Games’. Here’s the way to another – please take.

Thursday, 11 April 2013


Maggie is dead, and I am in a state of shock. Not because she died (expectedly) but because there is a stream of individuals, who were blind to her glaring abnormalities, and hypnotised by her Blair-like aura of self-invention. These are now coming forward with eulogies, while collectively organising an extravaganza of sand and candy-floss, to see her off. Quite what the Queen’s ‘motivation in this scene’ is, remains to be uncovered.

Once again, this depressing ‘Age of Perversity’ is demonstrating the sterile, cerebral nature of its value-judgements (wealth, profit, speed, yield, efficiency, etc) while the intuitive/visceral/feeling (female) capacity of the whole individual, is devalued. And I, for one, cannot help seeing the connection between the latter loss, and Maggie’s, mechanistic reign. Maggie had no time for simple contentment and human flourishing. Her ‘inner female’ was kept for calculated display, to be reported through the opportunistic press, to the duped proles. Sleeping little, she ‘managed’ us with harsh male dogma, and with the empathy of a private zoo owner.

Maggie – an alien life form – landed on Planet England and set about adjusting the atmosphere to meet her comfort. Some could hardly breathe, but others adapted . . . These adaptees are naturally of a mind to maintain the changes she wrought. Blair, a similar alien, could breathe freely and the trend continued. Girls are now raised and schooled to the Thatcher ideal. Their children seek wealth, possessions, and adulation. While government frets over bricks-and-mortar housing, mental illness (eviction from self) is rising. This is no triumph for a woman.

Westminster Creatures are chosen for their alien characteristics, by party committees; they are chosen to be able to survive in the miasmic atmosphere of Westminster’s fetid Chamber. Consequently, they are not the most representative of us; they are the most alien. Maggie was a quintessential Westminster Creature, but Westminster governance, manifestly, “isn’t working”.

PS: Opportunist Cameron says Maggie saved the country. “No! No! No!” Godlike: she remade us in her own image; we are thereby ‘lost’. Britain, today, is a much harsher country; irreversibly so. Ironically, the very attributes Cameron is praising, in his parliamentary eulogy, confirm her toughness, physical endurance, and combative qualities; none of the above being archetypal attributes of a natural human female. She was alien, even to her body-typing.

Monday, 4 February 2013


Underneath the “Gay Marriage” distraction, lies the well-spring of “The Age of Perversity” whose primary evil is the devaluation of motherhood.
Secondary to this, is assertion of equality of bottle with breast, followed by superiority of crèche to birth-mother. Then comes tender-age ‘schooling’ (a defensive strategy for fish) and institutional schooling, with an end-age of 18 mooted; cutting no slack for the overwhelming transition of puberty. Thereafter, in this perverse age, all emphasis is on material and mechanical status and gain, rewarded with money of imaginary value. Emergence of whole, mature adults, is not valued. Indeed, there is a growing suspicion governments prefers ineptitude.

From this dark mycelium, the ‘fruiting body’ of Gay Marriage thrusts itself into the light, and our opportunist governing aberrants declare, godlike, that “it is good”. But it is a side-show.

Core stability (conservative culture) has been lost to post-industrial Homo Sapiens; to wed or not to wed – that is a very long way from “The Question”. When culture denies Nature, society can only decline.

Saturday, 26 January 2013


“I, Destiny Dave, will give the people of Britain (at a time of my choosing – if I’m in power at all) a simple IN – OUT referendum.

The people will be given a simple choice:
“IN” with CASHBACK! Automatic entry into a free lottery. A free pen. Two tickets to Alton Towers (conditions apply). An EU recipe book. £20 worth of Marks and Spencer vouchers (conditions apply). A randomly selected DVD movie. A French wine voucher. A map of the EU. A Eurostar timetable. A pack of felt pens.

“The choice will be a simple IN – OUT vote; the people will decide. This is British, Westminster, Dave Cameron, Democracy at its finest. Some say it is ‘D’ MOCK CRASS Y? and they ask why Dave Cameron should be believed. Well, what I say to people is: I’m a pretty straight kind of guy.”

Friday, 25 January 2013


1/ Any MP-aspirant must have made proper representations to the local Acting returning officer and paid over a deposit. The aspirant is then a bona-fide candidate. 2/ The ultimate, de facto, ‘selection panel’ for the post of MP (ignoring, for purposes of this synthesis, any pre-selection,) is comprised of registered voters. But voters do not hire-directly, control, pay or dismiss, by statute, the MP they have approved, and installed, with their votes. 4/ No MP, once installed, has any duty, based in law, to serve, or even acknowledge, any voter. MP allegiance is to monarchy alone, thereafter, to personal whim. 5/ No person or body qualifies, in law, as an MP’s employer. No definable employer answers for any crimes, committed in the name of their employment, by an employee-MP. 6/ An aspirant MP may break election law, employing ‘Undue Influence’ (co-actually making fraudulent application for remunerated employment) and be answerable to no one. They say “money talks”. If I present IPSA with hard evidence that certain MPs who are being paid by IPSA, seeming to have improperly influenced voting in 2010, currently ‘sit’, shall you feel obliged to talk to me?

Monday, 30 July 2012


West Berkshire Council                                                               
Market Street                                                                                 Recorded delivery.
RG14 2LD
Cllr. Graham Jones                                                                    

30 July 2012

Dear Councillor Jones


This letter is sent in the spirit of David Cameron’s recent, multiple appeals, for a higher Standard of Morality. As with tax-avoidance, devious vote-accrual can be successfully engaged-in, if those who could make it their business to impose moral constraint, hide in the ‘quasi-letter’ of the law. I hope that you will honour David Cameron’s lead, and apply the highest standards of morality when engaging with the matter below.

In 2010, when I received the attached flyer, I could find no way to read its assertions as true. I was (and am still) in no doubt that the lies were intended to induce me to vote for Richard Benyon. (I immediately made him aware.) This inducement, I deemed to be unlawful: “Representation of The People Act 1983 (115)” – UNDUE INFLUENCE.

I made representation to the Acting Returning Officer of West Berkshire Council (D Holling) fully expecting a solicitous reaction, but he simply moved me on – as did a string of other, questionably disinterested, individuals. Over 26 months of effort, I have found no part of governance with sufficient moral mettle to engage. But David Cameron’s new thrust, now, must surely change all that? As it was WBC’s Acting Returning Officer who regulated the 2010 election, in which the offending flyer was distributed in Newbury, and delivered to me, I make first appeal to you.

Please read the attached flyer facsimile with care. Then, either: 1) show, precisely, how it could ever have been true – in the everyday (moral) sense of ‘true’ – having regard to all the uncontrollable variables pertaining at the time; or 2) acknowledge it as a multiple lie, and tell me what ethical course you will now take. Please set aside considerations of law, and attend to morality; law has not served well, to date. In keeping with David Cameron’s stance on tax-avoidance, a higher standard of conduct is also called for here.

As Mr Cameron, himself, declared in 2010: “We can’t go on like this”.

Yours sincerely

Barrie Singleton
4 River Walk Newbury RG14 5LD

PS If the internet data, re your position, is out of date, please forward appropriately.

Cc: Newbury Weekly News

Sunday, 8 April 2012


I suggest HomSap's brain is rather like the computer that flew an Airbus, slowly but inexorably, into the trees. We are going down, and it seems we cannot override the computer.

Westminster politics elevates the aberrant wannabe to Prime Minister, where they acquire feudal power - for a time.

Many 'educated' minds believe in PARTY politics, the way they believe in God. Going back to the plane crash: airliners have two pilots: are they called 'Government' and 'Opposition' - do they fight over the right way to 'run the lives' of passengers, all the way to the trees?

The same 'educated' individuals get animated about relevance of POLICY over PERSONALITY in politicians. I take this to mean that an alert and presentable individual, with obsessive petty theft in their background, should be hired as a museum guard.

Party politics wastes time and money, and ATTRACTS THE WRONG PEOPLE. Governance requires rare competence, integrity and wisdom; here come the trees.