Tuesday, 11 October 2011

IT REALLY IS A MAD WORLD

THE APE CONFUSED BY LANGUAGE HAS ADDED CENTURIES OF INSTITUTIONALISING SCHOOLING, DECADES OF ALPHA-TV, AND RECENT SOCIAL-ACTION-AT-A-DISTANCE. (#47 prompt)

This is not what Nature would do. The world is going mad.

I strongly suspect that AVERAGE INDIVIDUAL MATURITY, across the globe, is declining. Just taking the UK: 60+ million population, of progressively immature individuals, yields 600+ perverse extract in Westminster, who in turn distil the quintessential INSTITUTIONALISED, DEMON-DRIVEN, JUVENILE PM to a position of exquisite incompetence, and near-absolute power. (Mental age 6?)

This might explain one or two points in previous posts?

Paradoxically, we not only make smart bombs and war machines, but smart kit that can SHOW OURSELVES HOW DUMB WE ARE; we also have some smart analysts of our plight. But a wise, contented nation, AS A GOAL, cannot compete, in the Prime Minister Mind, with glorious slaughter of Johnnie Foreigner and ‘FAMOUS VICTORY’. Prime Ministers are FAR TOO PRIMITIVE (see above).

WE have a problem

Saturday, 1 October 2011

A NEW PPE QUALIFICATION

Stewardship of a nation, requires a very rare level of human competence in those charged with undertaking the task. Dave Cameron thinks that the "Best of the Best", in our society, become mercenary killers; that phrase (and his banal espousal of it) neatly encapsulate the bankruptcy of our culture, from aberrant top to absolute bottom.

When the English Spring comes, we must strive to create a diametric alternative to Westminster's abomination; an alternative that is steeped in philosophical calm, skilled in applied human psychology, and has a reverence for elegance* (in its most fundamental sense) in all things.

We can then remove this country from the madness of GDP, manipulated money, arms and warfare, aspiring instead, to raise maturity, contentment and wisdom, across the nation.

* http://thinkexist.com/dictionary/meaning/elegant/

CHESS CLUB FOR INCOMPETENTS

WESTMINSTER IS A CHESS CLUB FOR INCOMPETENT PLAYERS - WE ARE THEIR PAWNS.

Further, the 'Incompetent Elite' of Westminster, get to play Globopoly on the World Board, moving the higher value pieces of Johnnie Foreigner states. All the games are accompanied by side bets, laid with our money. Losing is of no account to the players.

The question that goes unaddressed, is "What manner of individual immerses themselves in serial failure (note the recent list of apologies from ALL parties) yet continues in office, while retaining the inappropriate title: HONOURABLE?"

The PERVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER GOVERNANCE roars in the stone deaf ear of media, while I roar in the other (equally deaf) ear:

"FOR EVIL TO TRIUMPH, ALL THAT IS REQUIRED IS FOR THOSE WHO MIGHT WELL DO SOMETHING, TO DO NOTHING."

Tuesday, 13 September 2011

A to Z of WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENTARIANS

Artful Banal Cynical Deceitful Evasive False Guileful Hypocritical

Iniquitous Jingoistic Kleptocratic Lawless Mendacious Obfuscatory

Pusillanimous Quisling (EU) Rosette-stands Snide Temeritous Unctuous

Venal Whipped X Yes-men Zoophytes

Sunday, 11 September 2011

BRUTISHNESS - THE WAR ON REASON 11 Sep 2011

My spell-checker takes a perverse delight in changing 'Britishness' to 'Brutishness' - it coyly refrains from adding: "Nuff sed".

Since I reluctantly woke, this morning, I have been following the Radio 4 output from NYC - dedicated to this anniversary of 9/11 'Shock and Awe'.

But whereas 9/11 was a SUDDEN unexpected (by the little folk) SHOCK, the disgraceful, conniving silence of the BBC (reaching a crescendo today) regarding ‘The American State Lie’, is a SLOW TORTURE to all aspiring 'GOOD MEN', WHO KNOW THAT REASON IS BEING BRUTALISED.

Will this be a day of infamy, to eclipse even the crass treatment of the death of Dr David Kelly?

BBC: if you are determined that all your 'good men' should DO NOTHING, regarding the ever-increasing weight of 9/11 REALITY, we shall just have to put you where you belong.

“You are either with US or the UNREASONISTS.

FOR EVIL TO TRIUMPH, ALL THAT IS REQUIRED IS FOR GOOD MEN TO DO NOTHING.

Friday, 9 September 2011

PERVERSE AGE: BENIGN EPOCH PLUS APING

HomSap ('intended' for harsher times) is born with a phenomenal computing power and no idea of what is going on. He 'advances' by OVERWRITING unconducive notions, NEVER ERASING; driven by a frenzied NEED to gain CONTROL (power) over body, environment and OTHERS. The poor fool samples his surroundings as a model to strive towards. This gives us mostly dysfunctional individuals. Maturity is, for the majority, an impossible goal. The way that our 'culture' is now configured (perverse) it manifestly mediates AGAINST maturing.

Those who cannot damp down the infant drive to control, become infantile politicians and those who realise they will never control anything - rioters.

Dave and Nick are both in the grip of deep, infantile need. They will snatch toys, poke eyes and bite until they (fail to) get what they (are convinced) they must have.

Those who brought about the perverse events of 9/11, are of similar ilk, and similarly demon-driven.

It (The Age of Perversity) will end in tears.

Tuesday, 6 September 2011

TAKE THE LIAR FLYER CHALLENGE 6 Sep 2011






I am getting grief from Newbury's MP, Richard Benyon. He asserts I am irrational. He asserts the statements in the flyer below (delivered to me 5th May 2010) are true. I say the ones concerning Gordon Brown are false. Can you read them as true?


The same generic Liar Flyer was delivered to the blameless folk of Cheltenham. It can be viewed at 'Electionleaflets.org. BUT: whereas, in Newbury, the Conservative retained his seat (i.e. he 'won') in Cheltenham, the LibDem retained his seat. THE CONSERVATIVES LOST - WE GOT A HUNG PARLIAMENT. But Gordon Brown did not return. A DOUBLE WHAMMY!

So were the assertions in the Liar Flyer true - by any stretch of an irrational MP's imagination?
Or are we looking at a 'False Instrument' as described in the 'Representation of the People Act 1983 section 115'? And are those sitting MPs who employed it to apply 'undue influence' to the voter mind, guilty of MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE?

Do let me know. If you can prove the assertions true, please 'SHOW YOUR WORKING' as exam papers used to say.